![]() Where are you guys getting the idea for a Hybrid USN BB, Kearsarge?. If you were to make yet a third USN BB line for fan service, it should had been a Brawler concept, similar to German Battlecruisers but 'murica. if you were going to make a Hybrid BB line, it should had been the second IJN BB line. but the logical option was a DD split or even a CV split, why a friggin' third BB line? besides being a flagrant fan-service/money grab, it makes absolute no sense from the game side of things. yeah I get it, it was the USN turn in the cycle, US people love big guns and yadda yadda. Next, they come up with the brilliant idea that the game needs yet a third USN BB line, not a second IJN BB line, not a second RU or French BB line (not like those make much sense anyway) but a third USN BB line. Missed opportunity but OK, they don't want a hybrid IJN CL line even if it makes more sense than anything else. Instead they went with a very insipid and not particularly interesting design, basically a side grade of the existing CA line that brings nothing new in terms of gameplay. ![]() ![]() what hidden truth are they seeing that is not evident from this side of the interaction?.įirst they come out with the new IJN CL line, if they wanted a hybrid line in the TT, there was literally no better candidate for it than a new IJN Cruiser line, either from historical or gameplay perspective it made a lot of sense to give the IJN a hybrid Cruiser line following Tone's concept. how did these guys arrived to this notion defying any apparent common sense conception?. I'm struggling to understand what thought process led development to consider a third USN BB hybrid line was the best thing to do, seriously.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |